One has to be careful about taking Junot Diaz too literally.
For instance, when he talks about Fuku, does he mean a curse in a literal or
metaphorical sense? Certainly, the legacy of the Trujillo regime impacted
generations of people adversely. Wouldn’t that justifiably make Oscar feel
cursed? Perhaps, too, we cannot know the author’s intentions with certainty.
The purpose of ambiguity in the text may be to entice us out of our cultural
comfort zone, thereby leaving interpretation to the individual. Could there be duplicitous
meaning in Diaz’s words?
For instance, I would argue that Abelard did not literally
believe that Trujillo was a supernatural being, despite Diaz’s written
narrative:
His shit, if we are to believe the
whispers, was an expose of the supernatural roots of the Trujillo regime! A
book about the Dark Powers of the President, a book in which Abelard argued
that the tales the common people told about the President—that he was
supernatural, that he was not human, may in some ways have been true. That it was possible that Trujillo
was, if not in fact, then in principle, a creature from another world. (245)
It is not explicitly stated that Abelard, a man of reason
with a scientific curiosity about the world, truly believed that Trujillo was a
supernatural being. “The whispers” were not those of Abelard; they belonged to someone
else. It was the evil that the Trujillo regime committed that was beyond
belief, not the fact of his existence. Indeed, the assertions about a supernatural
being are not stated as a declarative fact. The narrator’s words indicate that Diaz is
speaking metaphorically, not literally, when he says “if not in fact, then in
principle” (245). In other words, to a good man like Abelard, and to the people
of the Dominican Republic, the evil committed by Trujillo’s regime was so
grotesque that the “common people” could not believe that any human being was
capable of committing them. Those “whispers” were not substantiated facts; they
are the rumors of a people who cannot wrap their brains around such monstrous
evil.
Charles, I think your analysis of the supernatural which Diaz sprinkles through out The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao is interesting. It seems to me that even Diaz' readers will interpret fuku differently. Those of us who live in the American culture are probably going to have different interpretations of fuku than Dominican Republicans.
ReplyDeleteGood Point, Rachel. Thanks for sharing.
ReplyDelete