Thursday, January 15, 2015

Protecting their "Children": Women's Defense Towards Writing

     While reading The Balcony and the Mrs. Adolphus Smith piece, the commonality that stuck out to me was that the women were the homemaker, specifically in regards to children. The Mrs. Adolphus Smith piece specifically calls this out when she has to tell her husband twice how to take care of the child chocking on the button, showing his incompetence. In The Balcony, it speaks of the child and mother holding hands, implying that the mother is taking care of the child. This piece says that women sit on the balcony while their children sleep and that men do not sit on balconies, showing that the man has no input in the child rearing.


     In the pieces by Cavendish and Bradstreet, they defend and protect their writing, their “child” to an audience. The Mrs. Adolphus Smith piece has her ‘protecting’ her child from the unknowledgeable husband. The Balcony was the only piece in which women could be authors, though their stories were only via speaking. What stuck out to me from this was that women could become “authors” when there was no need to defend themselves, or their writing, which was difficult at this time, because of their role as subservient to men.

Caroline Kirkpatrick

3 comments:

  1. Caroline, the fact that you point out the relevance of "children" in these pieces is exactly why I feel that these female writer's are speaking to a maternal audience.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love that you related all four of the authors, in that they are all protecting their "child," whether it is an actual child or a book.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A smart post! I would also argue that it is easier for the women in "The Balcony" to be authors because they are telling stories orally. It's a different kind of authorship.

    ReplyDelete