Fanny Fern knew
that being a female writer in the 1850s was difficult and “Critics” makes that
clear. She ridicules what male critics would write about her writing because
she knows that they criticized her out of spite: “I never knew an editor to […]
write a scathing criticism on a book, because the authoress had declined
contributing to his paper.” The sarcasm is palpable throughout, not just this
line, but the entire piece. She asks rhetorical questions in the second
paragraph about how a man reacts when a female writer is successful, asking if
a man would have poor reactions to a woman’s success. Her sarcastic answer to
her rhetorical questions shows her feelings on the subject: “No – no – bless your
simple soul; a man never stoops to a meanness. There never was a criticism yet,
born of envy, or malice, or repulsed love, or disappointed ambition.” It’s
clear that she is angry at the men who ridicule her writing because of personal
distress.
I would agree that she is clearly angry at her situation and it definitely comes across in her writing. However, I believe it is not so much a personal distress that makes her so angry, but rather her distress for the whole female gender.
ReplyDeleteI should have made that more clear, but I meant the man's personal distress because he didn't like being upstaged by a woman.
ReplyDeleteFanny Fern had a backbone. It seems to me that she lived an authentic life, regardless of what anyone thought about her. I guess what puzzles me about Fern was her occasional conservatism. What was that about?
ReplyDelete